The GLOBAL DISABILITY NETWORK Bulletin Board

by **Keeping Them Honest** » Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:29 am

Haden Engineering Mitchell IDIOTS,Mander Toyota Qbn IDIOTS, Leslie Charles Gilroy THIEF, Andrew Phillip Scipione IDIOT, Gary Worboys NSW cop LIAR, Dave Kay NSW cop FRAUD LIAR, Mark McDonald Qbn LIAR PERJURER, Lightning Mobility Qbn SCAMMERS, Rod Aussel Qbn CONMAN THIEF, Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla THIEF ROBBER, Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla THIEF, Joan Margaret Ganzerla Brothel Madam, Belinda Jane Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Keuning THIEF, Tracey Anne Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Payne THIEF, Ben Nicholls Solicitor IDIOT, Elrington Boardman Allport Lawyers IDIOTS, Shirley Moore Qbn LIAR
Religious Clergy, pastors,priests, brothers, bishops who are paedophiles, child molesters,child assaulters, child predators and faggots (Pt 1)
PART ONE (1)Religious Clergy, priests, brothers, brethren, church officials and religious church leaders and members who are paedophiles, child predators, faggots, dung-punchers, shirt-lifters, poofs, child molesters and pillow-biters.
READ ABOUT MORE THIEVES, CROOKS, ROBBERS, SCAMMERS AND OUTLAWS
Andrew Phillip Scipione,NSW cop Gary Worboys, NSW cop Leslie Charles Gilroy, Haden Engineering Mitchell,Mander Toyota Qbn,Benjamin Nicholls Solicitor IDIOT Qbn,Elrington Boardman Allport IDIOTS,Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Keuning THIEF, Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Payne THIEF, Mark McDonald QBN,Detective Dave Kay NSW cop LIAR
Perjurer and liar at Mander Toyota Qbn
Haden Engineering Mitchell employ a prison convict jailbird
IDIOT Queanbeyan Lawyers Elrington Boardman Allport
Idiot Queanbeyan Solicitor Benjamin Nicholls
Corrupt LIAR NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Phillip Scipione
Armed robber, terrorist NSW corrupt cop Leslie Charles Gilroy
Liar NSW crooked cop Gary Worboys
Thief, home invader and drug dealer Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla
Liar, bullshit artist, NSW cop Detective Dave Kay
Thug, thief and idiot Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla
Criminal iar and perjurer Mark McDonald at Mander Toyota Qbn
Criminal house breaker and thief Tracey Anne Ganzerla
Drug addict, thief and adulteress Belinda Jane Ganzerla
Hooker, prostitute,brothel madam and thief Joan Margaret Ganzerla
READ ABOUT MORE THIEVES, CROOKS, ROBBERS, SCAMMERS AND OUTLAWS
Andrew Phillip Scipione,NSW cop Gary Worboys, NSW cop Leslie Charles Gilroy, Haden Engineering Mitchell,Mander Toyota Qbn,Benjamin Nicholls Solicitor IDIOT Qbn,Elrington Boardman Allport IDIOTS,Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Keuning THIEF, Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Payne THIEF, Mark McDonald QBN,Detective Dave Kay NSW cop LIAR
Perjurer and liar at Mander Toyota Qbn
Haden Engineering Mitchell employ a prison convict jailbird
IDIOT Queanbeyan Lawyers Elrington Boardman Allport
Idiot Queanbeyan Solicitor Benjamin Nicholls
Corrupt LIAR NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Phillip Scipione
Armed robber, terrorist NSW corrupt cop Leslie Charles Gilroy
Liar NSW crooked cop Gary Worboys
Thief, home invader and drug dealer Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla
Liar, bullshit artist, NSW cop Detective Dave Kay
Thug, thief and idiot Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla
Criminal iar and perjurer Mark McDonald at Mander Toyota Qbn
Criminal house breaker and thief Tracey Anne Ganzerla
Drug addict, thief and adulteress Belinda Jane Ganzerla
Hooker, prostitute,brothel madam and thief Joan Margaret Ganzerla

by **Keeping Them Honest** » Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:45 am

Haden Engineering Mitchell IDIOTS,Mander Toyota Qbn IDIOTS, Leslie Charles Gilroy THIEF, Andrew Phillip Scipione IDIOT, Gary Worboys NSW cop LIAR, Dave Kay NSW cop FRAUD LIAR, Mark McDonald Qbn LIAR PERJURER, Lightning Mobility Qbn SCAMMERS, Rod Aussel Qbn CONMAN THIEF, Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla THIEF ROBBER, Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla THIEF, Joan Margaret Ganzerla Brothel Madam, Belinda Jane Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Keuning THIEF, Tracey Anne Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Payne THIEF, Ben Nicholls Solicitor IDIOT, Elrington Boardman Allport Lawyers IDIOTS, Shirley Moore Qbn LIAR
Catholic sex abuse cases, priests,pastors,padres and bishops etc sexually molesting children
Catholic sex abuse cases
The Catholic sex abuse cases are a series of lawsuits, criminal prosecutions and scandals related to sexual abuse committed by Catholic priests and members of Catholic religious orders that first rose to widespread public attention in the last two decades of the 20th century. Although awareness of the widespread scope of these abuses first received significant media attention in Canada, Ireland and the United States, other cases were also reported in a number of other countries.
[size=150][color=#FF0000][b]READ ABOUT MORE THIEVES, CROOKS, ROBBERS, SCAMMERS AND OUTLAWS
Andrew Phillip Scipione,NSW cop Gary Worboys, NSW cop Leslie Charles Gilroy, Haden Engineering Mitchell,Mander Toyota Qbn,Benjamin Nicholls Solicitor IDIOT Qbn,Elrington Boardman Allport IDIOTS,Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Keuning THIEF, Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Payne THIEF, Mark McDonald QBN,Detective Dave Kay NSW cop LIAR
In a statement, read out by Archbishop Silvano Maria Tomasi in September 2009, the Holy See stated "We know now that in the last 50 years somewhere between 1.5% and 5% of the Catholic clergy has been involved in sexual abuse cases," adding that this figure was comparable with that of other groups and denominations.

In 2002, the John Jay report tabulated a total of 4392 priests and deacons in the U.S. against whom allegations of sexual abuse were considered by their diocese to have been "substantiated. In 2001, major lawsuits emerged in the United States and Ireland, alleging that some priests had sexually abused minors and that their superiors had conspired to conceal and otherwise abet their criminal misconduct.Although the scandals in the U.S. and Ireland unfolded over approximately the same time period, there are some significant differences between them. In the United States, most of the alleged abusers were parish priests under diocesan control. While there were also a significant number of abuse cases involving parish priests in Ireland, another major scandal involved abuse that was alleged to have been committed by members of religious orders working in Catholic-run institutions such as orphanages and reform schools. In the United States, the alleged abuse was primarily sexual in nature and involved mostly boys between the ages of and. In Ireland, the allegations involved both physical abuse and sexual abuse; children of both genders were involved, although a large majority were male.

Allegations of clergy sexual abuse have surfaced in numerous other countries (see Roman Catholic sex abuse cases by country). After the United States, the country with the next highest number of cases is Ireland with a significant number of cases being reported in Australia and New Zealand, and Canada. A significant number of cases have been reported in Europe, Latin America and Asia. As a representative example, the organisation Broken Rites has detailed 71 cases where Catholic priests have been convicted and jailed for child sex offences in Australia, as well as others involving non custodial sentences and inconclusive proceedings.

Nature of the problem in the United States
Main article: John Jay Report
In 2004, The John Jay Report commissioned by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops was based on surveys completed by the Roman Catholic dioceses in the United States. The surveys filtered provided information from diocesan files on each priest accused of sexual abuse and on each of the priest's victims, to the research team so that they did not have access to the names of the accused priests or the dioceses where they worked. The dioceses were encouraged to issue reports of their own based on the surveys that they had completed.

The report determined that, during the period from 1950–2002, a total of 10,667 individuals had made allegations of child sexual abuse. Of these, 3300 were not investigated because the allegations were made after the accused priest had died. After investigating the remaining 7700 allegations, the dioceses were able to substantiate 6,700 accusations against 4,392 priests in the USA, about 4% of all 109,694 priests who served during the time period covered by the study. The number of alleged abuses increased in the 1960s, peaked in the 1970s, declined in the 1980s and by the 1990s had returned to the levels of the 1950s.

Of the 4,392 priests against whom the accusations were deemed to be credible, 3,300 were not investigated because the allegations were made after the accused priest had died. Police were contacted regarding 1,021 of the remaining 1092 priests. 384 of these priests were prosecuted resulting in 252 convictions and 100 prison sentences. Thus, 6% of all priests against whom allegations were made were convicted and about 2% received prison sentences to date

According to the John Jay report, one-third of the accusations were made in the years 2002 and 2003. Another third of the allegations were reported between 1993 and 2001.

In the United States, an overwhelming majority of the victims, 81 percent, were males. A majority of the victims were post-pubescent adolescents with a small percentage of the victims being pre-pubescent children.

Some sources have asserted that most of the victims were between the ages of 16 and 17, making the sexual abuse instances of hebephilia rather than pedophilia. These sources argue that, by failing to make this distinction, the media has fostered a misconception of the problem. The John Jay Report determined that just under 6% of victims were 7 years of age or younger. 16% of the victims were between age 8 and age 10.[21] The vast majority of the victims (78%) were between age 11 and age 17. 15% of the victims were 16 to 17 years of age; 51% were between the ages of 11 and 14.[21]

In the United States, half of the 4392 priests who were found to have been credibly accused of abusing minors were 35 years of age or younger at the time of the first instance of alleged abuse. Fewer than 7% of the priests were reported to have themselves been victims of physical, sexual or emotional abuse as children. Although 19% of the accused priests had alcohol or substance abuse problems, only 9% were reported to have been using drugs or alcohol during the alleged instances of abuse. Almost 70% of the abusive priests were ordained before 1970.[21]

Based on a database of 3000 priests accused of sexual abuse that it says it has compiled, the group BishopAccountability.org claims that one-third of the abusive priests in the United States were of Irish birth or descent.[24]

Of the priests in the United States who were accused of sexual abuse, 59% were accused of a single allegation. Just under 3% of the priests were the subject of ten or more allegations. The 149 priests who had more than 10 allegations against them accounted for 2,960 of the total number of allegations.[21]

Although most of the cases involved parish priests, who were under diocesan control, there have also been sexual abuse cases concerning those in Roman Catholic orders, which often care for the sick or teach school.[citation needed][25]

Further information: Abuse by priests in Roman Catholic orders
[edit] Diocesan response to the problem
A major cause of the scandal surrounding clerical sexual abuse was criticism of the actions of Catholic bishops in responding to allegations of clerical abuse.[26] For the most part, responding to allegations of sexual abuse in a diocese was left to the jurisdiction of the bishop or archbishop.

[edit] Efforts to rehabilitate sexual abusers
A major focus of the lawsuits and media attention since 2002 has been criticism of the approach taken by bishops in the U.S. when dealing with allegations of sexual abuse by priests. As a general rule, the allegations were not reported to legal authority for investigation and prosecution. Instead, many dioceses directed the offending priests to seek psychological treatment and assessment. According to the John Jay report, nearly 40% of priests alleged to have committed sexual abuse participated in treatment programs. The more allegations a priest had, the more likely he was to participate in treatment.[21] Some bishops repeatedly moved offending priests from parish to parish, where they still had personal contact with children.[2][4]

In response to these allegations, defenders of the Church's actions have suggested that in re-assigning priests after treatment, bishops were acting on the best medical advice then available, a policy also followed by the US public school system when dealing with accused teachers.[citation needed]

According to the USCCB, Catholic bishops in the fifties and sixties viewed sexual abuse by priests as "a spiritual problem, one requiring a spiritual solution, i.e. prayer".[27] However, starting in the sixties, the bishops came to adopt an emerging view based on the advice of medical personnel who recommended psychiatric and psychological treatment for those who sexually abused minors. This view asserted that, with proper treatment, priests who had molested children could safely be placed back into ministry, although perhaps with certain restrictions such as not being in contact with children.[3][4][5][6] This approach viewed pedophilia as an addiction, such as alcoholism which many feel cannot be cured but which can be treated and restrained.[28] Some of the treatment facilities most frequently used for this purpose included the St. Luke Institute in Maryland; centers operated by the Servants of the Paraclete in Jemez Springs, NM, and St. Louis, MO; John Vianney Center in Downingtown, PA.; the Institute of Living in Hartford, CT; and the Southdown Institute near Toronto, ON .[29]

This approach continued to be practiced by the bishops well into the mid-1980s, a period which the USCCB characterizes as the "tipping point in the understanding of the problem within the church and in society".[27] As late as 1998, the Servants of the Paraclete were still ministering to sexually abusive priests at their center in Gloucestershire, England.[30]

Paul Isley asserts that, "The claims of unprecedented treatment success with clergy offenders has not been supported by published data."[31]

[edit] Criticism of the failure to remove sexually abusive priests
The Catholic hierarchy has been criticized for not acting more quickly and decisively to remove, laicise and report priests accused of sexual misconduct. In response to such criticism, contemporary bishops have asserted that the hierarchy was unaware until recent years of the danger in shuffling priests from one parish to another and in concealing the priests' problems from those they served. For example, Cardinal Roger Mahony of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, said: "We have said repeatedly that ... our understanding of this problem and the way it's dealt with today evolved, and that in those years ago, decades ago, people didn't realize how serious this was, and so, rather than pulling people out of ministry directly and fully, they were moved."[32]

One early opponent of the treatment of sexually abusive priests was Father Gerald Fitzgerald, the founder of The Congregation of the Servants of the Paraclete. Although Fitzgerald started the Servants of the Paraclete to assist priests who were struggling with alcohol and substance abuse problems, he soon began receiving priests who had sexually abused minors. Initially, Fitzgerald attempted to treat such priests using the same spiritual methods that he used with his other "guests". However, as he grew convinced of the futility of treating sexually abusive priests, Fitzgerald came to oppose vehemently the return of sexual abusers to duties as parish priests. He wrote regularly to bishops in the United States and to Vatican officials, including the pope, of his opinion that many sexual abusers in the priesthood could not be cured and should be laicized immediately.[33]

Eventually, Fitzgerald lost control of the Servants of the Paraclete. The center began to employ medical and psychological professionals who added psychiatry and medical treatment to the spiritual regimen of treatment favored by Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald continued to oppose these modifications to his treatment regimen until his death in 1969.[33]

In a New York Times article, Bishop Blase J. Cupich, chairman of the United States Bishops Committee for the Protection of Children and Young People, is quoted explaining why Father Fitzgerald’s advice "went largely unheeded for 50 years": First, "cases of sexually abusive priests were considered to be rare." Second, Father Fitzgerald's, “views, by and large, were considered bizarre with regard to not treating people medically, but only spiritually, and also segregating a whole population with sexual problems on a deserted island.” And finally, “There was mounting evidence in the world of psychology that indicated that when medical treatment is given, these people can, in fact, go back to ministry.” This was a view which Cupich characterized as one that "the bishops came to regret." [34]

[edit] Criticism of secrecy in diocesan handling of the problem
This section requires expansion.

It was revealed that some bishops had facilitated compensation payments to alleged victims on condition that the allegations remained secret.[citation needed] For example, according to the Boston Globe, the Archdiocese of Boston secretly settled child sexual abuse claims against at least 70 priests from 1992 to 2002.[citation needed]

In November 2009, the Irish Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse reported its findings in which it concluded that:

"the Dublin Archdiocese's pre-occupations in dealing with cases of child sexual abuse, at least until the mid 1990s, were the maintenance of secrecy, the avoidance of scandal, the protection of the reputation of the Church, and the preservation of its assets. All other considerations, including the welfare of children and justice for victims, were subordinated to these priorities. The Archdiocese did not implement its own canon law rules and did its best to avoid any application of the law of the State".[35]

[edit] Vatican efforts to deal with the problem
In 1962, Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani, Secretary of the Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, sent a letter which became known as the Crimen sollicitationis. In this letter, addressed to "all Patriarchs, Archbishops, Bishops and other Local Ordinaries, including those of Eastern Rite", the Holy Office laid down procedures to be followed in dealing with cases of clerics (priests or bishops) of the Roman Catholic Church accused of having used the sacrament of Penance to make sexual advances to penitents; its rules were more specific than the generic ones in the Code of Canon Law.[36] In addition, it instructed that the same procedures be used when dealing with denunciations of homosexual, paedophile or zoophile behaviour by clerics. It repeated the rule that any Catholic who failed for over a month to denounce a priest who had made such advances in connection with confession was automatically excommunicated and could be absolved only after actually denouncing the priest or at least promising seriously to do so.[37]

In 1983, the Vatican promulgated a revised Code of Canon Law which included a canon (1395, 2) which explicitly named sex with a minor by clerics as a canonical crime. In 2001, a revision of the document, in line with the 1983 Code of Canon Law and the 1990 Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, was issued.[38]

In April, 2001, the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela, or Safeguarding the Sanctity of the Sacraments. This replaced the Crimen sollicitationis. All priestly sex crimes were to be placed under the Holy Office which, in most cases, would authorize the bishops to conduct trials themselves.

This act has been criticized by some as making the process more secretive and lengthening the time required to address the allegations. For example, in his biography of John Paul II, David Yallop asserts that the backlog of referrals to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith for action against sexually abusive priests is so large that it takes 18 months to get a reply.[citation needed]

[edit] Criticism of secrecy in Church proceedings
Some parties have interpreted the Crimen sollicitationis as a directive from the Vatican to keep all allegations of sexual abuse secret, leading to widespread media coverage of its contents.[39][40][41] Lawyers for some of those making abuse allegations claimed that the document demonstrated a systematic conspiracy to conceal such crimes.[42][43] The Vatican responded that the document was not only widely misinterpreted, but moreover had been superseded by more recent guidelines in the 1960s and 1970s, and especially the 1983 Code of Canon Law.[44][45]

[edit] Progressive public awareness of the problem
Although nation-wide enquiries have only been conducted in the United States and Ireland, cases of clerical sexual abuse of minors have been reported and prosecuted in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and a number other countries.

In 1988, there were allegations of widespread abuse of children at the Mount Cashel Orphanage in Newfoundland. The religious order that ran the orphanage filed for bankruptcy in the face of numerous lawsuits. Since the Mount Cashel scandal erupted, a number of priests across the country have been accused of sexual abuse.

In 1994, allegations of sexual abuse on 47 young seminarists surfaced in Argentina.[46]

In 1995 Cardinal Hans Hermann Groër resigned from his post as Archbishop of Vienna over allegations of sexual abuse although he remained a Cardinal.[47]

Over a dozen priests of Archdiocese of Canberra and Goulburn, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Townsville, Ballarat, Bunbury, Wagga Wagga and Marist Fathers of Tasmania, convicted for sexual abuse.(see Catholic sexual abuse scandal in Australia).

[edit] Awareness of the problem in Canada
Although the sheer number of sexual abuse cases in the U.S. has focused public attention on that country, a smaller scale scandal actually emerged in Canada more than a decade before the one in the United States. In the late 1980s, allegations of physical and sexual abuse commited by members of the Christian Brothers who operated the Mount Cashel orphanage in St. John's, Newfoundland. The government, police and church cooperated in an attempt to cover-up the alleged abuse but this effort ultimately proved to be unsuccessful. In December 1989, the allegations were publicized in the St. John's Sunday Express. Eventually, more than 300 former pupils came forward with allegations of physical and sexual abuse at the orphanage.[48]

[edit] Awareness of the problem in the U.S.
Although bishops had been sending sexually abusive priests to facilities such as those operated by the Servants of the Paraclete since the 1950s, there was scant public discussion of the problem until the mid-1960s. Even then, most of the discussion was held amongst the Catholic hierarchy with little or no coverage in the media. The first public discussion of priest sexual abuse of minors took place at a meeting sponsored by the National Association for Pastoral Renewal held on the campus of Notre Dame University in 1967. All U.S. Catholic bishops were invited to attend that meeting. Various local and regional discussions of the problem were held by Catholic bishops in the ensuing years.

However, it was not until the 1980s that discussion of sexual abuse by Roman Catholic clerics began to be covered as a phenomenon in the media of the United States. According to the Catholic News Service, public awareness of the sexual abuse of children in the United States and Canada emerged in the late 1970s and the 1980s as an outgrowth of the growing awareness of physical abuse of children.

In 1981, Father Donald Roemer of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles pled guilty to felony sexual abuse of a minor. The case received widespread media coverage. In September 1983, the National Catholic Reporter published an article on the topic.[49]. The subject gained wider national notoriety in October 1985 when Louisiana priest Gilbert Gauthe pled guilty to 11 counts of molestation of boys.[50] After the coverage of Gilbert Gauthe subsided, the issue faded to the fringes of public attention until the mid-1990s, when the issue was again brought to national attention after a number of books on the topic were published.[51]

In early 2002, the Boston Globe's, Pulitzer Prize winning, coverage of sexual abuse cases involving Catholic priests drew the attention of first the United States and ultimately the world to the problem.[52][53][54] Other victims began to come forward with their own allegations of abuse resulting in more lawsuits and criminal cases.[2] Since then, the problem of clerical abuse of minors has received significantly more attention from the Church hierarchy, law enforcement, government and the media.

[edit] Awareness of the problem in Ireland
Starting in the 1990s, a series of criminal cases and Irish government enquiries established that hundreds of priests had abused thousands of impressionable children in previous decades. In many cases the abusing priests had been moved to other parishes to avoid embarrassment or a scandal, and senior clergy assisted in this. By 2010 a number of in-depth judicial reports had been published, but with relatively few prosecutions. The abuse was occasionally made known to staff at the Department of Education, the police and other government bodies, who have said that prosecuting clergy was extremely difficult given the "Catholic ethos" of the Irish Republic.

In the early 1990s, the media exposed the fact that two popular clerics, Eamon Casey, Bishop of Galway and Michael Cleary, known as the "singing priest", had fathered children. It was further disclosed that Casey had used church funds to buy the silence of the mother of his children. Cleary lived with his common-law wife and son while pretending that he was merely giving employment and assistance to her.[55] In 1994, Micheal Ledwith resigned as President of Maynooth College when allegations of sexual abuse were made public.

In June 2005 , Denis McCullough reported that, when advised of concerns about Ledwith's inappropriate behavior towards seminarians, a number of bishops had rejected those concerns "so completely and so abruptly without any adequate investigation" although his report conceded that "to investigate in any very full or substantial manner, a generic complaint regarding a person’s apparent propensities would have been difficult”.[citation needed]

One of the most notorious cases of sex abuse in Ireland involved Brendan Smyth, who, between 1945 and 1989, sexually abused and indecently assaulted twenty children in parishes in Belfast, Dublin and the United States.[56] Controversy over the handling of his extradition to Northern Ireland led to the 1994 collapse of the Fianna Fáil/Labour coalition government.[57]

[edit] Response of the Irish government to the scandal
Main article: Catholic sexual abuse scandal in Ireland
See also: Sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic archdiocese of Dublin, Ferns Report, Ryan report, and Murphy Report
In an address before the Irish parliament on May 11, 1999, Taoiseach Bertie Ahern announced a comprehensive program to respond to the scandal of abuse in the nation's Catholic-run childcare institutions. Ahern’s speech included the first official apology to those who had been abused physically and sexually while they had been in the care of these institutions. The Taoiseach asked the abuse victims for forgiveness, saying: “On behalf of the State and of all citizens of the State, the Government wishes to make a sincere and long overdue apology to the victims of childhood abuse for our collective failure to intervene, to detect their pain, to come to their rescue.”[57]

In response to the furor aroused by the media reports of abuse in Irish government institutions run by religious orders, the Irish government commissioned a study which took nine years to complete. On May 20, 2009, the commission released its 2600 page report, which drew on testimony from thousands of former inmates and officials from more than 250 institutions. The commission found that there were thousands of allegations of physical abuse of children of both sexes over a period of six decades. Over the same period there were also around 370 allegations of children who had suffered various forms of sexual abuse from religious and others.[58][59] The report also revealed that government inspectors had failed in their responsibility to detect and stop the abuse. The report characterized sexual molestation as "endemic" in some church-run industrial schools and orphanages.[citation needed]

In the wake of the broadcast of a BBC Television documentary "Suing the Pope", which highlighted the case of Seán Fortune, one of the most notorious clerical sexual offenders, the Irish government initiated an official inquiry into the allegations of clerical sexual abuse in the Irish Roman Catholic Diocese of Ferns. .[60] The inquiry resulted in the publication of the Ferns Report in 2005.

In response to the Ferns Report, Ireland's Prime Minister Brian Cowen stated that he was "ashamed by the extent, length, and cruelty" of child abuse, apologized to victims for the government's failure to intervene in endemic sexual abuse and severe beatings in schools for much of the 20th century. Cowen also promised to reform the Ireland's social services for children in line with the recommendations of the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse report.[61] Irish President Mary McAleese and Cowen made further motions to start criminal investigation against members of Roman Catholic religious orders in Ireland.[62]

In November 2009, Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse reported its findings in which it concluded that:

"the Dublin Archdiocese's pre-occupations in dealing with cases of child sexual abuse, at least until the mid 1990s, were the maintenance of secrecy, the avoidance of scandal, the protection of the reputation of the Church, and the preservation of its assets. All other considerations, including the welfare of children and justice for victims, were subordinated to these priorities. The Archdiocese did not implement its own canon law rules and did its best to avoid any application of the law of the State".

[35].

In 2009, The Murphy Report is the result of a three-year public inquiry conducted by Irish government into the Sexual abuse scandal in Dublin archdiocese, released a few months after the report of the Ryan report. The Murphy report stated that, "The Commission has no doubt that clerical child sexual abuse was covered up by the Archdiocese of Dublin and other Church authorities". It found that, "The structures and rules of the Catholic Church facilitated that cover-up." Moreover, the report asserted that, "State authorities facilitated that cover-up by not fulfilling their responsibilities to ensure that the law was applied equally to all and allowing the Church institutions to be beyond the reach of the normal law enforcement processes." The report criticized four archbishops – John Charles McQuaid who died in 1973, Dermot Ryan who died in 1984, Kevin McNamara who died in 1987, and retired Cardinal Desmond Connell – for not handing over information on abusers to legal authorities.[63]

[edit] Response of the Church to the scandal
Main article: Ecclesiastical response to Catholic sex abuse cases
The Catholic Church response to the scandal can be viewed on three levels: the diocesan level, the episcopal conference level and the Vatican. Responses to the scandal proceeded at all three levels in parallel, with the higher levels becoming progressively more involved as the gravity of the problem became more apparent.

Although the Vatican did not respond immediately to the series of articles published by the Boston Globe in 2002, it has been reported that Vatican officials were, in fact, monitoring the situation in the U.S. closely.[64] Over time, it became more apparent that the problem warranted greater Vatican involvement.

Before the Boston Globe coverage of the sexual abuse scandal in the Boston archdiocese, handling of sexual abuse allegations was largely left up to the discretion of individual bishops. After the number of allegations exploded following the Globe's series of articles, U.S. bishops felt compelled to formulate a coordinated response at the episcopal conference level.

In 2008, the Church asserted that the scandal was a very serious problem but, at the same time, estimated that it was "probably caused by 'no more than 1 per cent' (or 5,000) of the over 500,000 Roman Catholic priests worldwide.[3][65][66]

In 2009, two researchers reported that abuse cases had "steeply declined" after 1985 and that responses to abuse had changed substantially over 50 years, with suspension becoming more common than reinstatement.[67][68]

[edit] Diocesan responses to the scandal
Section: #Resignations, retirements and defrockings

Many of the accused priests were forced to resign or were defrocked. In addition, several bishops who had participated in the cover-up were also forced to resign or retire.[69]

Dioceses in the United States have paid more than 2.6 billion US dollars in abuse-related costs since 1950.[70]

As of March 2006, dioceses in the United States had made financial settlements with the victims totaling over 1.5 billion dollars[21] The number and size of these settlements made it necessary for the dioceses to reduce their ordinary operating expenses by closing churches and schools.[2] Several dioceses chose to declare chapter 11 bankruptcy as a way to litigate settlements while protecting some church assets to insure it continues to operate.

[edit] Response of the Church in Ireland
In June 2001, the hierarchy of the Catholic Church in Ireland established the Catholic Church Commission on Child Sexual Abuse (Ireland), also known as the Hussey Commission, to investigate how complaints about clerical abuse of minors have been handled over the last three decades.

In February 2002, 18 religious orders agreed to provide more than 128 million Euros (approximately $128 million) in compensation to the victims of childhood abuse. Most of the money was raised from church property transfers to the State. The agreement stipulated that any victims who accepted monetary settlements would waive their right to sue both the church and the government. In addition, the identities of the accused abusers was to be kept secret.[citation needed]

[edit] Response of the Church in the Phillipines
When sexual scandals involving Catholic priests in the US came to light in 2002, the Philippines media began reporting on abuses by local priests. In July of that year, the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines apologized for sexual misconduct committed by its priests over the last two decades and committed to drafting guidelines on how to deal with allegations of such offenses. According to Archbishop Orlando Quevedo, president of the Catholic Bishops Conference, about 200 of the country's 7,000 priests may have committed "sexual misconduct" – including child abuse, homosexuality and affairs – over the past two decades.[71]

[edit] Effects of lawsuits on dioceses and parishes in the United States
[edit] Compensation payments, bankruptcies and closures
Main article: Settlements and bankruptcies in Catholic sex abuse cases

According to Donald Cozzens, "by the end of the mid 1990s, it was estimated that [...] more than half a billion dollars had been paid in jury awards, settlements and legal fees." This figure grew to about one billion dollars by 2002.[72] Roman Catholics spent $615 million on sex abuse cases in 2007.[2][73]

The dioceses in which abuse was committed or in which abuse allegations were settled out of court found it necessary to make financial settlements with the victims totaling over $1.5 billion as of March 2006,[21] have had a significant impact on the finances of many dioceses. The number and size of these settlements made it necessary for the dioceses to reduce their ordinary operating expenses by closing churches, parishes and schools in order to raise the funds to make these payments.[2]

In many instances, dioceses were forced to declare bankruptcy as a result of the settlements. At least six U.S. dioceses sought bankruptcy protection. In some cases, the dioceses filed bankruptcy just before civil suits against them were about to go to trial. This had the effect of mandating that pending and future lawsuits be settled in bankruptcy court.

[edit] Resignations, retirements and defrockings
Many of the accused priests were forced to resign or were defrocked. In addition, several bishops who had participated in the cover up were also forced to resign or retire.[69]

Bernard Francis Law, Cardinal and Archbishop of Boston, Massachusetts, United States resigned after Church documents were revealed which suggested he had covered up sexual abuse committed by priests in his archdiocese.[74] December 13, 2002 Pope John Paul II accepted Law's resignation as Archbishop and reassigned him to an administrative position in the Roman Curia naming him archpriest of the Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore and he presided at one of the Pope's funeral masses. Law's successor, Capuchin friar member Bishop Séan P. O'Malley found it necessary to sell substantial real estate properties and close a number of churches in order to pay the $120 million in claims against the archdiocese.

Two bishops of Palm Beach, Florida, resigned due to child abuse allegations, resigned bishop Joseph Keith Symons was replaced by Anthony O'Connell, who later also resigned in 2002.

[edit] Response of the Church in the U.S.
As the breadth and depth of the scandals became apparent in dioceses across the United States, it became apparent to the American bishops that a joint response was warranted at the episcopal conference level. John F. Allen Jr. characterized the reaction of the USCCB as calling for “swift, sure and final punishment for priests who are guilty of this kind of misconduct.” In contrast to this, Allen characterized the Vatican's primary concern as wanting to make sure “that everyone’s rights are respected, including the rights of accused clergy" and wanting to affirm that it is not acceptable to "remedy the injustice of sexual abuse with the injustice of railroading priests who may or may not be guilty.”[64]

[edit] Prevention efforts
In response to perceived deficiencies in canonical and secular law, both ecclesiastical and civil authorities have implemented procedures and laws to prevent sexual abuse of minors by clergy and to report and punish it if and when it occurs. In 2002, the USCCB adopted a policy for responding to allegations of sexual abuse. The USCCB characterized this policy as being "zero tolerance".[75][76] Catholic News Service reported that, by 2008, the U.S. church had "trained 5.8 million children to recognize and report abuse. It had run criminal checks on 1.53 million volunteers and employees, 162,700 educators, 51,000 clerics and 4,955 candidates for ordination. It had trained 1.8 million clergy, employees and volunteers in creating a safe environment for children."[77]

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) perceived a lack of adequate procedures for the prevention of sexual abuse of minors, the reporting of allegations of such abuse and the handling of those reports. In June 2002, the USCCB moved to address these deficiencies by promulgating a Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People that pledged the Catholic Church in the U.S. to providing a "safe environment" for all children in Church-sponsored activities. The thrust of the charter was the adoption of a "zero tolerance" policy for sexual abuse.[75][76] The Charter instituted reforms to prevent future abuse by requiring background checks for Church employees.[8] The Charter requires dioceses faced with an allegation to alert the authorities, conduct an investigation and remove the accused from duty.[8][78] A Dallas Morning News article claimed nearly two-thirds of the bishops attending had themselves at one point covered for sexually abusive priests.[79]

[edit] Reception by the laity
A study conducted by Georgetown University Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA) in 2006 found that, although many Catholics were unaware of the specific steps that the church as taken, when informed large majorities approve these actions. 78% strongly approved of reporting allegations of sexual abuse by clergy to civil authorities and cooperating in civil investigations. 76% strongly approved of removing from ministry people credibly accused of sexual abuse of a minor.[80][81][82]

[edit] Ongoing investigations
While the Church in the United States claims to have addressed the issue, some disagree. In 2005, Dr. Kathleen McChesney of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said that the crisis was not yet over because hundreds of victims across the country were still reporting past episodes of abuse. She said: "In 2004, at least 1,092 allegations of sexual abuse were made against at least 756 Catholic priests and deacons in the United States. Most of the alleged incidents occurred between 1965 and 1974. What is over is the denial that this problem exists, and what is over is the reluctance of the Church to deal openly with the public about the nature and extent of the problem."[83]

Despite the National Review Board's own estimates that there have been some 5,000 abusive priests in the US, to date only 150 have been successfully prosecuted. Some critics of the Church such as Patrick Wall attribute this to a lack of cooperation from the church. In California, for example, the archdiocese has sought to block the disclosure of confidential counseling records on two priests arguing that such action would violate their First Amendment right on religious protection.[84]

[edit] The Vatican's response
John F. Allen Jr., Vatican correspondent for the National Catholic Reporter, has commented that many American Catholics saw the Vatican’s initial silence on the Boston Globe stories as showing a lack of concern or awareness about the issue. However, Allen said that, he doesn't know anyone in the Roman Curia, who was not at least horrified "by the revelations that came out of the Globe and elsewhere" or would defend "Cardinal Law’s handling of the cases in Boston" or "the rather shocking lack of oversight that revealed itself" though "they might have different analyses of what should have happened to him".[64] Allen described the Vatican's perspective as being somewhat skeptical of the media handling of the scandal. In addition, he asserted that the Vatican viewed American cultural attitudes toward sexuality as being somewhat hysterical as well as exhibiting a lack of understanding of the Catholic Church.[64] According to Allen, cultural differences between the Vatican and American Catholics complicated the process of formulating a comprehensive response to the sexual abuse scandal: "there is a lot about the American culture and the American Church that puzzles people in the Vatican, and there is much about the Vatican that puzzles Americans and English speakers generally."[64]

On April 30, 2001, John Paul II, issued a letter stating that "a sin against the Sixth Commandment of the Decalogue by a cleric with a minor under 18 years of age is to be considered a grave sin, or 'delictum gravius.'"[80] In 2003, Pope John Paul II stated that "there is no place in the priesthood and religious life for those who would harm the young".[7]

In April 2003, the Pontifical Academy for Life organized a three-day conference, entitled "Abuse of Children and Young People by Catholic Priests and Religious", where eight non-Catholic psychiatric experts were invited to speak to representatives of almost all of the Vatican dicasteries. The panel of experts overwhelmingly opposed implementation of policies of "zero-tolerance" such as was proposed by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. One expert called such policies a "case of overkill" since they do not permit flexibility to allow for differences among individual cases.[80] The panel of experts identified the following factors contributing to the sexual abuse problem:[85] 1. Failure by the hierarchy to grasp the seriousness of the problem, 2. Overemphasis on the need to avoid a scandal, 3. Use of unqualified treatment centers, 4. Misguided willingness to forgive, 5. Insufficient accountability.

In April 2003, the Pontifical Academy for Life organized a three-day conference, entitled "Abuse of Children and Young People by Catholic Priests and Religious", where eight non-Catholic psychiatric experts were invited to speak to near all Vatican dicasteries' representatives. The panel of experts overwhelmingly opposed implementation of policies of "zero-tolerance" such as was proposed by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. One expert called such policies a "case of overkill" since they do not permit flexibility to allow for differences among individual cases.[80] The panel of experts identified the following factors contributing to the sexual abuse problem:[86] 1. Failure by the hierarchy to grasp the seriousness of the problem, 2. Overemphasis on the need to avoid a scandal, 3. Use of unqualified treatment centers, 4. Misguided willingness to forgive, 5. Insufficient accountability.

Archbishop Csaba Ternyak, secretary of the Congregation for Clergy, put the following question to the experts: "[T]o what degree one can talk about the rehabilitation of the offender, what are the most effective methods of treatment, and on what grounds we can say that a person who has never offended is at risk to sexually molest someone?" [80][87]

Ternyak spoke about the way that the crisis had damaged the priest-bishop relationship. He noted that there was a "sense of gloom" felt by the overwhelming majority of priests who had not been accused of any abuse but nonethless who perceived that their bishops had turned against them and therefore had "become disillusioned about the effectiveness of the laws of the Church to defend their dignity and their inalienable rights". Ternyak also noted that "there have been more than a few suicides among accused priests."[80] In addition, during a visit to the United States Pope Benedict XVI said that he is "deeply ashamed" of the clergy sex abuse scandal that has devastated the American church and apologized for the sexual abuse of minors by Catholic clergy and pledged that pedophiles would not be allowed to become priests in the Catholic Church.[88] Pope Benedict also said he is ashamed for child abuse scandal in Australia.

Because a significant majority of victims were teenage boys, the Vatican instituted reforms to prevent future United States abuse by requiring background checks for Church employees[8] and issued new rules disallowing ordination of men with "deep–seated homosexual tendencies".[6][10] They now require dioceses faced with an allegation to alert the authorities, conduct an investigation and remove the accused from duty.[8][89]

See also: John V. Doe v. Holy See and Juan Carlos Patino-Arango
William McMurry, a Louisville, Kentucky lawyer, filed suit against the Vatican[90] in June 2004 on behalf of three men alleging abuse as far back as 1928, accusing Church leaders of organizing a cover up of cases of sexual abuse of children. In November, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals in Cincinnati denied the Vatican's claim of sovereign immunity and allowed the case to proceed. The Vatican did not appeal the ruling.

However, when Pope Benedict was personally accused in a lawsuit of conspiring to cover up the molestation of three boys in Texas by Juan Carlos Patino-Arango in Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston, he sought and obtained diplomatic immunity from prosecution.[91] Some have claimed that this immunity was granted after intervention by then US President George W. Bush.[92] The Department of State "recognize[d] and allow[ed] the immunity of Pope Benedict XVI from this suit."[93]

During a recent visit to the United States Pope Benedict admitted that he is "deeply ashamed" of the clergy sex abuse scandal that has devastated the American church. Benedict pledged that pedophiles would not be priests in the Roman Catholic Church.[94]

In a statement, read out by Archbishop Silvano Maria Tomasi at a meeting of the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva on 22 September 2009, the Holy See stated that the majority of Catholic clergy who had committed acts of sexual abuse against under 18 year olds should not be viewed as paedophiles but homosexuals who are attracted to sex with adolescent males. The statement said that rather than pedophilia, it would "be more correct" to speak of ephebophilia; being a homosexual attraction to adolescent males ....... "Of all priests involved in the abuses, 80 to 90% belong to this sexual orientation minority which is sexually engaged with adolescent boys between the ages of 11 and 17."[17][95]

The move angered many gay rights organisations, who claimed it was an attempt by the Vatican to redefine the Church's past problems with pedophilia as problems with homosexuality.[96]

[edit] Criticism of media coverage
There was significant negative public opinion regarding what was perceived as the failure of the Catholic hierarchy to respond adequately to allegations of sexual abuse and the seemingly sluggish response of the Vatican to the unfolding scandal. Some sources argue that this negative public opinion was exaggerated by misconceptions and differences in perspectives.

Some sources argue that the negative public opinion was fueled in part by statements made to the media by various parties with differing agendas including lawyers for those suing the Church for damages resulting the alleged sexual abuse. As the public furor over the scandal grew, some members of the Catholic Church began to see an anti-Catholic agenda behind some of these pronouncements.

Criticism of media coverage by Catholics and others centered on an excessive focus being placed on Catholic incidences of abuse. Such voices argue that equal or greater levels of child sexual abuse in other religious groups or in secular contexts such as the US public school system have been either ignored or given minimal coverage by mainstream media.[97][98] Commentator Tom Hoopes wrote:

during the first half of 2002, the 61 largest newspapers in California ran nearly 2,000 stories about sexual abuse in Catholic institutions, mostly concerning past allegations. During the same period, those newspapers ran four stories about the federal government’s discovery of the much larger — and ongoing — abuse scandal in public schools.[99]

Philip Jenkins claims that the Roman Catholic Church is being unfairly singled out by a secular media which he claims fails to highlight similar sexual accusations in other religious groups, such as the Anglican Communion, Islam and Judaism, and various Protestant churches, communities. Jenkins asserted that media coverage of the abuse story had become "..a gross efflorescence of anti-catholic rhetoric."[100]

[edit] Debate over the causes of the sexual abuse
Main articles: Debate on the causes of clerical child abuse and Criteria for the Discernment of Vocation for Persons with Homosexual Tendencies
[edit] Seminary training
Clergy themselves have suggested their seminary training offered little to prepare them for a lifetime of celibate sexuality. Rome's Congregation for Catholic Education issued an official document, the Criteria for the Discernment of Vocation for Persons with Homosexual Tendencies[101] in 2005, which attracted criticism based on an interpretation that the document implies that homosexuality leads to pedophilia.[102]

[edit] Declining standards explanation
In The Courage To Be Catholic: Crisis, Reform, and the Future of the Church, George Weigel claims that it was the infidelity to orthodox Roman Catholic teaching, the "culture of dissent" of priests, women religious, bishops, theologians, catechists, Church bureaucrats, and activists who "believed that what the Church proposed as true was actually false" was mainly responsible for this problem.[103] Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick, retired Archbishop of Washington, blamed the declining morals of the late 20th century as a cause of the high number of sexually abusive priests.[104]

Ultra-conservative Roman Catholics claimed that the Second Vatican Council itself (1962–1965) fostered a climate that encouraged priests to abuse children.[citation needed] The council directed an opening of the doors to meet the world. However traditional Roman Catholics believe that this led to a conversion of Roman Catholics to secularism rather than vice versa.[citation needed] Others respond that abuse by priests was occurring long before the start of Vatican II and that many of the Roman Catholic sex abuse cases did not involve pedophilia.[citation needed]

Other assert that the increased reporting of abuse in child-care institutions during this time was concomitant with rising police interest, investigation and prosecution of such crimes. As such it is not certain that a sudden "crisis of abuse" ever existed, instead the dramatic increase in reported abuse cases may simply have heralded the end of a long-term endemic problem found throughout a number of institutions, both secular and religious, prior to the introduction of quality control measures specifically aimed at preventing such abuses from occurring.[citation needed]

[edit] Supply and demand explanation
It has been argued that the shortage of priests in North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand.[105][106] caused the Roman Catholic hierarchy to act in such a way to preserve the number of clergy and ensure that sufficient numbers were available to serve the congregation despite serious allegations that these priests were unfit for duty.[citation needed] Others disagree and assert that the Church hierarchy's mishandling of the sex abuse cases merely reflected their prevailing attitude at the time towards any illegal or immoral activity by clergy.
[size=150][color=#FF0000]READ ABOUT MORE THIEVES, CROOKS, ROBBERS, SCAMMERS AND OUTLAWS LIKE THE ONES WHO ROBBED JIM AND JUDY TIERNEY
Andrew Phillip Scipione,NSW cop Gary Worboys, NSW cop Leslie Charles Gilroy, Haden Engineering Mitchell,Mander Toyota Qbn,Benjamin Nicholls Solicitor IDIOT Qbn,Elrington Boardman Allport IDIOTS,Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Keuning THIEF, Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Payne THIEF, Mark McDonald QBN,Detective Dave Kay NSW cop LIAR
Perjurer and liar at Mander Toyota Qbn
Haden Engineering Mitchell employ a prison convict jailbird
IDIOT Queanbeyan Lawyers Elrington Boardman Allport
Idiot Queanbeyan Solicitor Benjamin Nicholls
Corrupt NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Phillip Scipione
Armed robber NSW corrupt cop Leslie Charles Gilroy
Liar NSW crooked cop Gary Worboys
Thief, home invader and drug dealer Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla
Liar, bullshit artist, NSW cop Detective Dave Kay
Thug, thief and idiot Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla
Criminal iar and perjurer Mark McDonald at Mander Toyota Qbn
Criminal house breaker and thief Tracey Anne Ganzerla
Drug addict, thief and adulteress Belinda Jane Ganzerla
Hooker, prostitute,brothel madam and thief Joan Margaret Ganzerla
READ ABOUT MORE THIEVES, CROOKS, ROBBERS, SCAMMERS AND OUTLAWS
Andrew Phillip Scipione,NSW cop Gary Worboys, NSW cop Leslie Charles Gilroy, Haden Engineering Mitchell,Mander Toyota Qbn,Benjamin Nicholls Solicitor IDIOT Qbn,Elrington Boardman Allport IDIOTS,Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Keuning THIEF, Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Payne THIEF, Mark McDonald QBN,Detective Dave Kay NSW cop LIAR
Perjurer and liar at Mander Toyota Qbn
Haden Engineering Mitchell employ a prison convict jailbird
IDIOT Queanbeyan Lawyers Elrington Boardman Allport
Idiot Queanbeyan Solicitor Benjamin Nicholls
Corrupt LIAR NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Phillip Scipione
Armed robber, terrorist NSW corrupt cop Leslie Charles Gilroy
Liar NSW crooked cop Gary Worboys
Thief, home invader and drug dealer Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla
Liar, bullshit artist, NSW cop Detective Dave Kay
Thug, thief and idiot Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla
Criminal iar and perjurer Mark McDonald at Mander Toyota Qbn
Criminal house breaker and thief Tracey Anne Ganzerla
Drug addict, thief and adulteress Belinda Jane Ganzerla
Hooker, prostitute,brothel madam and thief Joan Margaret Ganzerla

by **Keeping Them Honest** » Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:58 am

Haden Engineering Mitchell IDIOTS,Mander Toyota Qbn IDIOTS, Leslie Charles Gilroy THIEF, Andrew Phillip Scipione IDIOT, Gary Worboys NSW cop LIAR, Dave Kay NSW cop FRAUD LIAR, Mark McDonald Qbn LIAR PERJURER, Lightning Mobility Qbn SCAMMERS, Rod Aussel Qbn CONMAN THIEF, Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla THIEF ROBBER, Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla THIEF, Joan Margaret Ganzerla Brothel Madam, Belinda Jane Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Keuning THIEF, Tracey Anne Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Payne THIEF, Ben Nicholls Solicitor IDIOT, Elrington Boardman Allport Lawyers IDIOTS, Shirley Moore Qbn LIAR
Dwayne "DJ" Wilson a Church of God in Christ Minister rapes a teenage boy.
Group blasts church over accused child molester

Minister is charged with sexually abusing a teenager

Still, he remains in his post at Church of God in Christ

SNAP to church officials: "Why take risks with children's safety?"

"It's good to forgive," group says, "but it's wrong to be reckless with kids"

Self help organization urges church members to fight pastor’s “dangerous decision”

Denominational staff should hold open public meeting with Q & A session over "irresponsible move"

WHAT
Holding signs and childhood photos, clergy sex abuse victims will hold a sidewalk news conference outside a church that is generating controversy by keeping a recently arrested music minister in his post. They will also
-urge anyone who saw, suspected or suffered the man's crimes to come forward, get help & call police,
-offer to speak to the congregation about how to respond appropriately when child sex charges emerge, and
-prod denominational officials to hold an open public meeting at the church to address the controversy

WHEN
Tuesday, Dec. 1, 1:00 p.m.

WHERE
Outside the COGIC headquarters, 930 Mason Street in Memphis

WHO
Two sex abuse victims who are members of a support group called SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAPnetwork.org), including a Memphis man who is the organization’s local director

WHY
On Nov. 17, Dwayne "DJ" Wilson, 25, was arrested Nov. 17. He’s charged with statutory rape involving a teenaged church member.

Despite this, church staffers, including Pastor Ronald Rolfe (785 0756, ronrol@aol.com), have kept Wilson in his post as music minister at Greater St. Mark’s COGIC Church (3570 Weaver Road in Memphis, 789 0744). His wife Paula is at QueenRolfe@aol.com

SNAP believes this is a reckless move that will only put kids in harm's way. Forgiving someone is a private and often healing act. But giving a known child predator an exalted title and role and access to kids is a public and always risky act, the organization says.

SNAP also wants the denominational leaders to give church members, some of whom are apparently threatening to quit over the controversy, a chance to ask questions about the move.

The pastor claims that forgiveness is required. That, SNAP says, is “misguided at best, and dangerous at worst.” The group feels that our first duty – moral and civic – is to help keep youngsters and adults, by sharing what we know about possible crimes with law enforcement. Once sex offenders are convicted and jailed, SNAP thinks, then they can be forgiven (but never again given positions of power in congregations).

SNAP is convinced that a truly remorseful or 'reformed' sex offender would not even seek a position at a church, just as a truly repentant and sober alcoholic wouldn't seek a job in a tavern.

According to the Commercial Appeal, Wilson is out on bond and is scheduled to appear in court December 9.

READ ABOUT MORE THIEVES, CROOKS, ROBBERS, SCAMMERS AND OUTLAWS LIKE THE ONES WHO ROBBED JIM AND JUDY TIERNEY
Andrew Phillip Scipione,NSW cop Gary Worboys, NSW cop Leslie Charles Gilroy, Haden Engineering Mitchell,Mander Toyota Qbn,Benjamin Nicholls Solicitor IDIOT Qbn,Elrington Boardman Allport IDIOTS,Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Keuning THIEF, Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Payne THIEF, Mark McDonald QBN,Detective Dave Kay NSW cop LIAR
Perjurer and liar at Mander Toyota Qbn
Haden Engineering Mitchell employ a prison convict jailbird
IDIOT Queanbeyan Lawyers Elrington Boardman Allport
Idiot Queanbeyan Solicitor Benjamin Nicholls
Corrupt NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Phillip Scipione
Armed robber NSW corrupt cop Leslie Charles Gilroy
Liar NSW crooked cop Gary Worboys
Thief, home invader and drug dealer Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla
Liar, bullshit artist, NSW cop Detective Dave Kay
Thug, thief and idiot Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla
Criminal iar and perjurer Mark McDonald at Mander Toyota Qbn
Criminal house breaker and thief Tracey Anne Ganzerla
Drug addict, thief and adulteress Belinda Jane Ganzerla
Hooker, prostitute,brothel madam and thief Joan Margaret Ganzerla

by **Keeping Them Honest** » Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:38 am

Haden Engineering Mitchell IDIOTS,Mander Toyota Qbn IDIOTS, Leslie Charles Gilroy THIEF, Andrew Phillip Scipione IDIOT, Gary Worboys NSW cop LIAR, Dave Kay NSW cop FRAUD LIAR, Mark McDonald Qbn LIAR PERJURER, Lightning Mobility Qbn SCAMMERS, Rod Aussel Qbn CONMAN THIEF, Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla THIEF ROBBER, Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla THIEF, Joan Margaret Ganzerla Brothel Madam, Belinda Jane Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Keuning THIEF, Tracey Anne Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Payne THIEF, Ben Nicholls Solicitor IDIOT, Elrington Boardman Allport Lawyers IDIOTS, Shirley Moore Qbn LIAR
Reverend James R Porter Immaculate Conception School in Revere molested young boy in corridor
[url=http://austlawpublish.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=44]Like other victims of pedophile priests,Tom remembers vividly what happened just after
he was molested in a dark corridor at Immaculate Conception School in Revere by the[/url]
Rev. James R. Porter. It was 1960. He was 12. But he still recalls running.
ran, and then he hid. Under a desk in a second-floor classroom, frozen in terror as Porter called out for him. And then he ran again, out of the school and home.
Chris was victimized about 12 years ago. He remembers struggling as the Rev. John J.Geoghan groped him in the rectory at St. Julia's in Weston before he squirmed out of Geoghan's grasp. As Geoghan yelled after him, ''No one will ever believe you,'' Chris ran from the room. He ran from the rectory. He ran behind the church - and cowered thereuntil his father came for him. Geoghan was right; Chris never said a word.
Now Tom and Chris have stopped running. Thomas R. Fulchino, the father, and Christopher T. Fulchino, his son, are victims of Massachusetts' two most notorious priestpedophiles - three decades apart. For their family, lightning struck twice..
Now, the Fulchino family has decided to speak out. Father and son - and Susan, wife to
one victim and mother of another - liken themselves to other Geoghan victims: They
represent the consequences of Cardinal Bernard F. Law's decision to knowingly send a
pedophile priest to their parish.
For all of Tom Fulchino's success, and the family's affluent life in Weston, the
consequences have been devastating. A year ago, Susan was hospitalized for depression
for several months. Chris, who is now 25, has become a workaholic. Often, he said, he
awakens from dreams about Geoghan. When that happens, no matter the hour, he gets up
and takes a shower.

Tom, at Susan's prodding during a long interview last week, acknowledged that he has
long been ''emotionally reserved'' because of his abuse at Porter's hands. But since Chris
first told his parents four years ago what Geoghan did to him, Tom and Susan say Tom
has become even more remote.

Father and son have much in common: Both have nightmares. Both still try to shake the
sense of guilt and shame. Tom never told his parents; Chris said nothing until the day five
years ago when Geoghan was publicly identified as a sex abuser.

''We were watching the TV news. I was sitting next to Mom,'' Chris recalled as his mother
struggled to fight back tears. ''And there was Geoghan, being accused of abusing all these
children. And my Mom said, `That bastard.' And I said, `Mom, I'm one of them, one of
the victims.' She just looked at me. She didn't know what to say. So we just walked
upstairs, and we told my dad.''

Over the past 40 years, Tom Fulchino said, he has conquered some of his own demons.
Mostly, he said of that horrid moment in 1960, ''You block it. You just totally put it behind
Door Number 6 in your mind.''

But for the last five years, Fulchino has found himself overwhelmed less by what happened
to him than by the guilt he feels that a father who was wary of priests because of his own
experience could have let the same thing happen to his son.

In agreeing to tell their story and be identified, the Fulchinos said they hope their story will
comfort other victims. They want people to understand the emotional damage that befalls
entire families when priests molest children. And they pray - Tom and Susan still pray,
despite it all - that speaking out will help them too.

After learning in the last month how much Law knew about Geoghan before sending him
to Weston, they decided to sue the cardinal and the bishops - the ''good old boys club,''
Susan called them - who facilitated Geoghan's movement from parish to parish.

''Geoghan is a sick man. And he was a sick man on the loose,'' Tom Fulchino said. ''It was
up to Cardinal Law and the people to control that person. But they did nothing. They're
just as responsible as Geoghan is.''

Roderick MacLeish Jr. of the law firm Greenberg Traurig, who is representing the family,
called their experience ''a tragedy of enormous proportions.''

''Those in the Archdiocese of Boston who made the decision to continue the ministry of
this monster, Father Geoghan, with full knowledge of the risks involved to innocent
children, need to explain to the Fulchinos and the public what possibly could have been
running through their minds,'' MacLeish said. ''These were intelligent men making
incredibly misguided decisions. And families and children paid tremendous price for it.''

Donna M. Morrissey, the cardinal's spokeswoman, issued a statement last night saying the
church had just learned from the Globe about what she called ''this latest tragedy.''
Morrissey pledged that the archdiocese would offer the family ''full pastoral and counseling
support.''

''Our prayers go out to this family, as they must have endured profound suffering and
trauma,'' she said.

It is barely a mile from the Fulchinos' Weston home to St. Julia's, where they attended
Mass, where their five children went to Confraternity of Christian Doctrine classes every
Sunday.

But no one from the family sets foot in St. Julia's anymore - not since the day they learned
of Chris's abuse.

When he is home from his job in Maine, Chris said, he takes back roads to avoid even
driving past St. Julia's. There is no church he will enter, Chris said, because every church
reminds him of Geoghan.

Even so, Chris's parents said they harbor no bitterness toward Catholicism or toward the
vast majority of Catholic priests. ''I've always believed in the church. I believe in the
Catholic faith,'' said Tom Fulchino, who is now 53. ''I had eight years of the nuns, and
eight years of the Jesuits. You can't shake it.''

He is a ''double Eagle,'' a graduate of both Boston College High School and Boston
College. When he was a boy, his was such a devout family that a local priest - a ''good
priest,'' Fulchino hastens to add - was a constant visitor to his home and a fast friend to his
father. He never told his parents about Porter. Had he gone to them, he said, they would
not have believed something like that could have happened.

Those good priests remain in his thoughts. This scandal, Tom says, ''is not just hurting the
victims - it's hurting these good priests that are out there that have dedicated their whole
life to working and to helping people. The way Law has handled this situation has just
destroyed what these guys have done. And they work hard. And I think they're victims
too.''

The Fulchinos moved to Weston in 1983, wary from Tom's experience but determined
that all five children would have the religious upbringing they had as children. The following
year, Law dispatched Geoghan to the parish.

At the time, the Globe Spotlight Team reported last month, Law had just removed
Geoghan from St. Brendan's Church in Dorchester for molesting children. And he knew
Geoghan had been taken out of St. Andrew's in Jamaica Plain in 1980 after he admitted to
abusing seven boys in one extended family. Back then, according to church records,
Geoghan said the abuse was not ''serious.''

But St. Julia's parishioners knew none of this. Nor did they know why Geoghan was on
sick leave in 1989 - for again molesting children. Even so, Law approved sending
Geoghan back to St. Julia's.

Law ''let him back in there, back into St. Julia's,'' Tom Fulchino said as he pondered the
likelihood yesterday that his son was abused after Geoghan's 1989 sick leave.

Chris Fulchino was 13, and in the seventh grade, when Geoghan ensnared him. To this
day, he remains uncertain of the precise date. But he turned 13 a month after Geoghan's
1989 return from pedophilia treatment.

On Sundays, Geoghan made the rounds of CCD classes, asking questions, sometimes
passing out quarters and candy for the right answers. That Sunday, Chris had the right
answer.

But Geoghan, he said, was fresh out of quarters and candy.

Chris recalls, his voice trembling, that Geoghan said, ''If you come over to the [rectory]
during your break, I'll have milk and cookies with you and we'll say `Our Father.' I was
like, `Hey that's awesome!'''

In a dark room in the rectory, Geoghan was sitting in a lone red velvet chair, with two
glasses of milk and chocolate chip cookies on a plastic platter. He hoisted his unsuspecting
guest onto his lap, and they said the ''Our Father.'' That was when Geoghan molested him.

Father and son remember the brute force of their attackers. ''I thought I was going to die.
I couldn't breathe,'' Tom Fulchino says of his struggle against Porter so long ago. From
Chris, there is nearly an echo: ''He squeezed me as tight as he could. I felt like I couldn't
breathe, and I was gagging.''

''The bottom fell out.'' That's what Tom Fulchino said happened to the family after Chris
told them about Geoghan.

''Once it came out about Christopher, there was an overwhelming guilt,'' said Susan
Fulchino. ''And then I suffered a breakdown.''

During an emotionally intense two-hour interview last week, Susan comforted both men,
sometimes through tears. She encouraged them to speak up and resolved to reach out to
other mothers whose families are victims.

Despite it all, she has kept her faith. ''I feel badly that my kids may not walk back into the
church again. That really bothers me,'' she said, ''because we believe in God.

''You need to believe in something.''

READ ABOUT MORE THIEVES, CROOKS, ROBBERS, SCAMMERS AND OUTLAWS
Andrew Phillip Scipione,NSW cop Gary Worboys, NSW cop Leslie Charles Gilroy, Haden Engineering Mitchell,Mander Toyota Qbn,Benjamin Nicholls Solicitor IDIOT Qbn,Elrington Boardman Allport IDIOTS,Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Keuning THIEF, Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Payne THIEF, Mark McDonald QBN,Detective Dave Kay NSW cop LIAR
Perjurer and liar at Mander Toyota Qbn
Haden Engineering Mitchell employ a prison convict jailbird
IDIOT Queanbeyan Lawyers Elrington Boardman Allport
Idiot Queanbeyan Solicitor Benjamin Nicholls
Corrupt NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Phillip Scipione
Armed robber NSW corrupt cop Leslie Charles Gilroy
Liar NSW crooked cop Gary Worboys
Thief, home invader and drug dealer Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla
Liar, bullshit artist, NSW cop Detective Dave Kay
Thug, thief and idiot Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla
Criminal iar and perjurer Mark McDonald at Mander Toyota Qbn
Criminal house breaker and thief Tracey Anne Ganzerla
Drug addict, thief and adulteress Belinda Jane Ganzerla
Hooker, prostitute,brothel madam and thief Joan Margaret Ganzerla
READ ABOUT MORE THIEVES, CROOKS, ROBBERS, SCAMMERS AND OUTLAWS
Andrew Phillip Scipione,NSW cop Gary Worboys, NSW cop Leslie Charles Gilroy, Haden Engineering Mitchell,Mander Toyota Qbn,Benjamin Nicholls Solicitor IDIOT Qbn,Elrington Boardman Allport IDIOTS,Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Ganzerla THIEF, Belinda Jane Keuning THIEF, Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Ganzerla THIEF, Tracey Anne Payne THIEF, Mark McDonald QBN,Detective Dave Kay NSW cop LIAR
Perjurer and liar at Mander Toyota Qbn
Haden Engineering Mitchell employ a prison convict jailbird
IDIOT Queanbeyan Lawyers Elrington Boardman Allport
Idiot Queanbeyan Solicitor Benjamin Nicholls
Corrupt LIAR NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Phillip Scipione
Armed robber, terrorist NSW corrupt cop Leslie Charles Gilroy
Liar NSW crooked cop Gary Worboys
Thief, home invader and drug dealer Lloyd Stephen Ganzerla
Liar, bullshit artist, NSW cop Detective Dave Kay
Thug, thief and idiot Eugene Cleveland Ganzerla
Criminal iar and perjurer Mark McDonald at Mander Toyota Qbn
Criminal house breaker and thief Tracey Anne Ganzerla
Drug addict, thief and adulteress Belinda Jane Ganzerla
Hooker, prostitute,brothel madam and thief Joan Margaret Ganzerla